On Wed, Apr 22, 1998 at 04:40:12PM -0700, George Bonser wrote: : On Wed, 22 Apr 1998, Jason Costomiris wrote: : : > 1) Native support for Maildir format mailboxen : : and that is better?
Yes. I'm one of those nuts who believes in reliable delivery with an NFS mounted mail spool. :-) Also much more resilient, and less prone to corruption and message loss. : > 2) *much* more configurable than pine : : But is missing some key items. : : Put another way. If you have to support a couple of hundred relative unix : clueless, I would rather they use pine than mutt. I will admit that it : has sveraql months since I last took a look at it, I am willing to have : another look. If they indeed are "unix clueless", it will take forever for them to fathom the idea of a VTY. I can hear it now... "pine? Do I get that through FTP or is it that telenet thingamajig?" If they are indeed "unix clueless", you'll run a POP or IMAP server and give them their pretty Windoze or Mac mailers. -- Jason Costomiris <>< | Linux... [EMAIL PROTECTED] | "Find out what you've been missing http://www.jasons.org/~jcostom/ | while you've been rebooting Windows NT." #include <disclaimer.h> | --Infoworld -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
