> > I am sorry, but I think that my correction is important: XFree86 will > > remain under old BSD-like license, NOT GPL. Making XFree86 GPL'ed would > > cause > > a majot disaster for Linux. > Actually I think your correction is irrelevant. The point is that > XFree86 will remain free, which was what the original poster was asking; > the details of which license are not needed. And I don't think the > continued anti-GPL doom and gloom on this list helps anybody; > please leave it in gnu.misc.discuss. Maybe I belong to a minority but I found the correction necessary and relevant. Actually it's only a three-line response and if you don't like it you can ignore it, but it WAS a correction, and it means that something did need to be corrected.
jabberwock ### By lack of understanding they remained sane. (George Orwell) ### -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
