Joey Hess wrote: > > Is your /usr/X11R6/bin/xload a symlink to /usr/lib/xaw-wrappers/wrapper ?
Yes. > I tried to reproduce this, and I can't -- I get another set of errors: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~>xload > ldd: can't open /usr/X11R6/bin/xload.real (Permission denied) > xaw-wrappers: unable to determine libc version of /usr/X11R6/bin/xload.real. Hmmm. This is the error I get now too... > > What version of xaw-wrappers are you using? 0.19 Drat. Actually, I think it must have been 0.18 when I wrote that email. I upgraded xaw-wrappers around lunchtime today. > This begs the question -- why on earth is xload suid on a debian system? It > doesn't need to be! I think you can just remove the suid bit from xload and > then it will work ok with xaw-wrappers. That's a good question. I haven't done this. This is basically a vanilla Debian system. I haven't touched the permissions on any file as of yet. 8( In fact: griffon:~> ls -l /usr/bin/X11/xload* lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 29 Mar 9 13:39 /usr/bin/X11/xload -> /usr/lib/xaw-wrappers/wrapper -rws--x--x 1 root root 8656 Jan 12 01:55 /usr/bin/X11/xload.real griffon:~> Why is xload.real mode set to 4711? Weird. Behan -- Behan Webster mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +1-613-224-7547 http://www.verisim.com/ -- E-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST. Trouble? E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
