Joakim Burman wrote: > > Hi Debian users, > > Some "Newbie" questions... > > Is... Debian 1.3=stable=bo?
1.3.x is stable (codename is bo) > Is... Debian 1.3.x=unstable=hamm? 2.0.x is unstable (means changing not buggy). It is codenamed hamm > Can I run unstable packages on a bo-kernel? > Can I run stable packages on a hamm-kernel? (e.g backward-compatible) The kernel has little to do w/ packages. I run 2.0.33 on a hamm system. The default hamm kernel is also a bo kernel. What makes hamm different than bo is the new libc. Most apps are dynamically linked to this lib. SO bo packages may not work on hamm, and hamm packages WILL NOT work on bo. For you windows people it is like two different versions of a DLL. > > Thanks... > > /Joakim > > -- > TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] . > Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
