That shouldn't be hard.... Have you though tof using 1 or 2 computers as fileservers? After a quick read of teh FHS (filesystem standard) the setup is made to allow the shareing of large parts of the filesystem between computers. Then anytime you add a program to the system (usually in /usr/bin etc) it is added to all of them as it is you will probably want to share the home directories for users anyway /usr itself can not only be shared...but can be mounted READ ONLY to prevent its destructiuon (you would want it writeable maybe on one or two machines so that you can administer it) of course the main problem is if the fileserver computer fails... but there should be solutions for that too... I havn;'t done much myself with it... it would probably mean using NFS or some other system that allows shareing between computers A great setup that I remember from when I was upgrading the computers at
a large department store (big rollout) was that they had 2 computers acting as the main servers... 1 just mirrored the main one..and if the main one went down..the "Alternate" took over ...and the rest of the store didn't even know the difference I don't know how hard that would be to setup....but it should be possible from what I know... RedHat's system is mainly to set 1 machine up and have an easy way to clone it (I believ ethey call it kickstart...you do the setup once...then just pop it in and walk away...it dows the install automatically) as for the "Change 1 config file" that could be done too... you wouldn'tr want to share /etc tho...because then that shares everything...which isn't always good (wouldn't want them all to have the same IP adress) tho you could mount a shared version of etc and have the shared configs be sym links to the shared mounted version but...im just pulling these ideas off the top of my head... bottom line is it can be done...its just a matter of how you want to do it and what your needs are exactly I mean...you don't really want every system running servers (or do you?) I dunno...just my $.02 On Wed, 11 Feb 1998, Tim Sailer wrote: > I guess I didn't explain real well the first time, although I enjoyed > the thread.. > > On this compute farm, they want to make changes to 1 machine, as in adding > a package, changing a config file, etc and having the resultant changes > reflected on the other 199 machines, without having to go to each > machine and tweak it. Installing the machines will be a short, but > intense process, but they are looking for long range admin solutions. > > Thanks, > Tim -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
