On Fri, 5 Dec 1997, John Bradley Fitzgibbons wrote: > >I've been watching all of the messages concerning libc6 upgrades and now >I've just got to ask. How unstable is hamm? My major interest is due to >development. I'd really like to start playing around with version 6, but >I'd hate to destroy my system to do it... :) I have an admin level >knowledge of unix so feel free to be honest with me. Thanks in advance >for any input.
Can't be too bad if Redhat is basing 5.0 on it... And its considered released. (Although, I think 2.0.5c is still considered beta, wasn't 2.1 supposed to be the commercial grade release?) -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
