Pete Harlan wrote: > > > I notice that MIT now has a Linux build for PGP5.0 > > US version. I know that there is a PGP Debian package > > Does anyone know what's up with Phil, anyway? How can he, of all > people, expect anyone to trust cryptography without source? > > Sorry for the off-topic. I hope nobody bothers to package this up for > Debian unless source is released. There, now it's on-topic. > > And please correct me if source for 5.0 is available... > > -- > Pete Harlan > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The MIT page has a copy of the signatures for the Windows and Mac binaries, nothing for the Linux binary. I'm sure a quick note to the maintainer will aleviate that lack. Unfortunately, Phil is not really involved with the MIT distribution, nor the International version which the German (at least) Debian site has a package for. Now that PGP.com has been purchased by another company in which RSA Inc is a major player, there is no telling how long it will be before there is no way to trust the commercial versions at all. Hey, isn't this exactly why we're running Linux? I think some cooperation 'twixt Debian and MIT is in order. If I knew anything about compiling packages, I'd do it. Curt- -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
