> > can anyone get 2.1.68 or 2.1.69 to compile? > > > > hamish > > > > Hamish, > 2.1.67 had some changes to the installation scripts that broke make-kpkg. > I've been watching the lists and I don't think > anyone has noticed yet (except you and me). 2.1.68 has all kinds of new > signal stuff that don't compile properly at all. > 2.1.69 is said to be stable, though I haven't tried it myself.
I've tried 2.1.69 with make-kpkg without (almost) any problems. I had problems to compile sound and umsdos modules but everything else works without problems (i'm not sure if i've done everything right way but i had Debian 1.3.1 and i upgraded ldso to latest version from hamm and compiled ne modutils - 2.1.55, and naturally kernel itself). New kernel runs on my home computer so there is no network in it (i didn't compiled it even as a module). __________________ Leszek Gerwatowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] __________________ -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
