>>>>> "john" == john <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
john> What will happen then when I make patches for use on systems
john> that don't have this new version of patch?
There is no need to worry.
First of all, patch files are generated by `diff' and not `patch'.
Secondly, the problem with `patch' is only with the command line
arguments used to specify the backup file extension. A recent version
of `patch' changed that, and `dpkg-source' changed with it, but newer
version of `patch' has (should we say: by popular demand :-) reverted
to the old (standard) way of specifying this.
What all of this means is only that your version of `dpkg-source' must
match your version of `patch'.
---------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
Christian Lynbech | Computer Science Department, University of Aarhus
Office: R0.32 | Ny Munkegade, Building 540, DK-8000 Aarhus C
Phone: +45 8942 3218 | [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- www.daimi.aau.dk/~lynbech
---------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
Hit the philistines three times over the head with the Elisp reference manual.
- [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael A. Petonic)
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble?
e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
