> > Does adding a no_root_squash (like below) change anything?
> >
> > /directory host(no_root_squash)
>
> It's already there:
OK, I didn't want to test anything myself, as that meant adding
no_root_squash myself. But I've done that now, and I see what
you mean.
I don't really think this has anything to do with setuid stuff
or anything, as "ls" running as root itself doesn't see anything
eighter.
Yes, this looks as a bug to me.
Recently, netstd_3.00 has been released (libc6, unstable), that one
may behave differently. Unfortunately, due to a bug in it (it sefaults
on squach_uid stuff), I cannot install it on my machine.
> Does my test program work for you?
Well, just "ls" doesn't work eigther (and "ls filename" doesn't much
but stat eighter), so I don't think your program would make much
difference.
Does "ls" work for you? (I hope not!)
--
joost witteveen, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#!/usr/bin/perl -sp0777i<X+d*lMLa^*lN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0<j]dsj
$/=unpack('H*',$_);$_=`echo 16dio\U$k"SK$/SM$n\EsN0p[lN*1
lK[d2%Sa2/d0$^Ixp"|dc`;s/\W//g;$_=pack('H*',/((..)*)$/)
#what's this? see http://www.dcs.ex.ac.uk/~aba/rsa/
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
