No. The FSSTND was designed to support a read-only /usr. The FHS is the next iteration of FSSTND, the Linux file system standard.
-- Jean Pierre On Sat, 6 Sep 1997, Paul J. Thompson wrote: > thanks for the response. it seems like quite an undertaking, however > -- a lot more files then i expected. maybe it really isn't a reality > to mount root read-only but a better idea to simply keep it very > regularly backed up. maybe, however, usr can still be mounted > read-only. do you know of any files there which would prohibit this? > > > I find it unfortunate that /etc cannot be mount read-only. Will the > > FHS address this problem? -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
