Olaf Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> RFC822 would be the appropriate one here, and it does impose some
> restrictions regarding what can and cannot be a date header:
[snip]
> So it certainly looks like Orn needs to fix his mailer.
RFC2047 is also applicable - it's responsible to the mangled addresses
you see sometimes if you MUA isn't aware of the proposed standard.
However, I don't think it should be applied to Date: headers.
Also, I note that RFC822 defines the day part of a date as only the
English names, not something like "Mið" (however that turns out when
TM and various MTA's get done with it). And the only valid
non-numeric time zones are: UT GMT EST EDT CST CDT MST MDT PST PDT, or
a single letter except J (not "BST").
RFC822 also seems to have a year-2000 bug.
--
Carey Evans <*> http://home.clear.net.nz/pages/c.evans/
kernel: Warning: possible SYN flooding. Sending cookies.
kernel: validated probe(100007f, 100007f, 11557, 5010, -1645409555)
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble?
e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
