On 02-Sep-97 Craig Sanders wrote: > >anyway, that's all beside the point. what i'm really writing to say is: >if you'd like to maintain the package for debian, i'll send you what >i've done so far.
Sure, I would like to have a look at it. The version that I currently have packaged is 1.1 which looks a lot smoother than the older version that I had and the newer versions are supposed to be even better from what I hear. What I like is to be able to auto-expire messages in mailing list folders ... kind of like newsgroup articles do. This makes subscriptions to multiple mailing lists easier to manage. > >from memory, my package doesn't need much work (maybe a little tidying up) >to be suitable for inclusion in non-free. I will send you an address where you can put it by anon ftp. Which version is it? > >(its copyright says "This software can be freely distributed and modified >for non-commercial purposes as long as the above copyright message and >this permission notice appear in all copies of distributed source code or >included as separate file in binary distribution. Commercial use of this >software requires the permission of the authors.") I mentioned making a debian package to the author and he was all for it. I suppose the restriction on commercial use and the copyright inclusion requirement would put it in non-free. -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
