Humm!, you find it offensive that people shouldn't be allowed to offend others? .... This freedom and liberty that you so want to protect, does it include the liberty to deprive folk of the freedom not to be offended, or the freedom to choose what they would not tolorate in their mailboxes ... or is it just another vote for selfishness and inconsideracy. I am all for policing offensive material in _PERSONAL_ mailboxes .. In that respect, I would rather a list where nothing was lawful than one where everything was lawful.
--Jonathan On Sat, 23 Aug 1997, Clint Adams wrote: > > My first suggestion for the charter would be that profanity should not be > > tolerated: no matter whom it comes from. > > Just English profanities or those of any language? Who's going to maintain > the list of forbidden words? Not only is that ridiculous, I find it > offensive. > > > -- > TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] . > Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . > > -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
