(James D. Freels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote: > > > I commend the Debian development team for choosing the 2.0.29 kernel > rather than the 2.0.30 kernel in the v 1.3.1 release. My experience > with the 2.0.30 kernel is that it caused the latest stable release of > the Ibcs2 emulator software (970513) to fail. This was important to > me in order to run the vendor's (APC) software for smart-ups based on > SCO emulation. Perhaps there are other stories of Ibcs2 or other > 2.0.30 failures the Debian users would like to share? >
The afs client software we use at Stanford uses a module that is unhappy in 2.0.30. 2.0.31 is supposed to solve memory-manager problems, and that will allow a newer version of the client to be made. Sticking with 2.0.29 was definitely a good idea. -- -Mike Horansky, Leland Consultant (http://consult.stanford.edu/) [EMAIL PROTECTED] OPINIONS EXPRESSED BY ME ARE NOT NECESSARILY SHARED BY MY EMPLOYERS. -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
