On Sun, Jun 08, 1997 at 10:50:19PM -0600, Rick Macdonald wrote: > On Sun, 8 Jun 1997, Gary L. Dolan wrote: > > > StarOffice looks like quite a piece of work, althou a bit slow since > > I am using the static linked libraries. > > Why would this make it slower? The only thing I can think of is if you're > running more than one of the StarOffice programs and you're short of > memory causing paging to occur that might not if you could use the shared > libs. Is this what you mean?
The StarOffice READMEs warn that it will be slower, from memory. In any case, I would have to say that on my hardware (Cyrix 6x86 P150+, 32mb, Trio64V+ video card), Word 95 is noticably faster than StarWriter, which is quite disappointing. I would have thought anyone could wirite a faster WP than MS ... Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt, StudIEAust [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student, computer science & computer systems engineering. 3rd year, RMIT. http://hamish.home.ml.org/ (PGP key here) CPOM: [**** ] 47% The opposite of a profound truth may well be another profound truth. --Bohr -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
