On Fri, 9 May 1997 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > It's practically a moot point now with bo so close to release, but > in the future perhaps it would make sense to include the latest and > greatest (and thus presumably the most stable) 2.0 kernel in the stable > distribution, and the latest 2.1 kernel in the unstable distribution?
I agree. I thought I'd seen someone using 2.1.36 but thought it was a typo. I would like to see the absolute latest kernel's in unstable. Seems to me that's what it's for. I seems to be used more as pre-stable than unstable (a subtle difference). --Rick [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
