On Fri, Apr 25, 1997 at 02:14:27PM -0400, Rick Jones wrote: > Errr...I don't trust LBA. I ran LBA for several months and began to see a > little corruption in my file system which began to propigate. Even though > e2fsck came up clean programs began reporting missing files but an ls -al > would show the file in the right place. I don't know if it was LBA that > caused it but since I re-installed in normal mode I haven't seen this > problem again.
Well, on my machine here I have a 1.6gb and a 3.2gb drive. I need LBA to get things working with DOS/95, and I've never had any trouble with it. I get a couple of zero dtimes on fscks occasionally (on the forced check) but nothing serious. Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt, StudIEAust [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student, computer science & computer systems engineering. 3rd year, RMIT. http://yallara.cs.rmit.edu.au/~moffatt (PGP key here) CPOM: [**** ] 42% -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
