On Fri, 21 Mar 1997 00:36:13 MST Jason Gunthorpe ([EMAIL PROTECTED] .ca) wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Mar 1997, Adam Shand wrote: > > It sounds great... but what about those of us without a gus? :) > > Well, porting over the digital mixer would be interesting, doable very > quickly -- just don't cry when a 20 channel song brings your 486 to it's > knees :> (A 486dx-50 can sustain about 30 channels with all the asm code > in place) Kewl ! > Does anyone know how to control the order in which constructors are called > during program startup (for global static objects). To allow the metaclass > construction to work properly I need to have assurance it will do it in > the right order. Watcom, Borland and High C all had pragmas to control > this, I couldn't find such a thing in GCC yet. I don't know if there is. This shouldn't be needed for good nice C++ code :-) There are ugly workarounds though... Phil.
