Scott Stanley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > The real fix seems to go to lprng. That's the official position of the
> > maintainer as well, as stated in a msg. to this list last year. I'll
> > do it as soon as I have a chance.
> >
>
> If the recommended fix (by the package maintainer even) is to switch from
> lpr to lprng, shouldn't lpr be switched out of Standard and lprng moved
> from Optional into Standard?
I tried to push LPRng as the default, but I learned that there is
still software (e.g. netatalk) that relies on subtle properties of
classic BSD lpr, so dropping lpr is no option yet.
Sven
--
Sven Rudolph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ; WWW : http://www.sax.de/~sr1/
