I've been living off the unstable tree for almost a year. Back when the version was 0.95r6 or something like that.
I really haven't had any problems to speak about, and certainly not all the problems that people are writing about when upgrading 1.1 -> 1.2. One reason may be that I just don't have as many packages installed, but I was wondering if anybody had any other explainations as to why many small incremental upgrades over the months seems to be more stable (in the sense of installations not breaking) than making larger leaps from point release to point release. I'd really like to hear that my observation is indeed false, since upgradability is, of course, one of our major claims for Debian. ...RickM... -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
