It seems like a lot of ISPs don't support uucp or charge extra to set it up so
I've never really explored it. It may just be that a lot of ISPs don't
advertise that they support it (and I haven't been asking).
I'll look into uucp over TCP/IP.
Thanks,
Al Youngwerth
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
----------
From: Nick Busigin[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 1996 4:44 PM
To: 'debian-user'
Cc: Al Youngwerth
Subject: RE: virtual mail domains... long-winded response
On Wed, 18 Dec 1996, Al Youngwerth wrote:
> I'd sure like to hear from other ISPs and linux masquerading/diald
> users out there and how they handle virtual domains. Using linux with
> masquerading and diald is becoming a very popular way to connect small
> LANs to businesses so I think its something that ISPs should support well.
>
> More ideas and comments?
Hello Al,
What do you think of using MX records to a uucp host and using uucp and
sendmail's uucp-dom mailer? You can use uucp over a TCP/IP connection, so
it should work with well with diald.
Nick
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nick Busigin <Sent from my Debian/GNU Linux Machine> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To obtain my pgp public key, email me with the subject: "get pgp-key"
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
