> >> I would prefer a much improved dselect. >> Todays dselect is not convinient to be used. >> It is like emacs to the novice. (cryptic, non-standard interface, funny >> keyboard accel keys, no menues...) > >Hmmm - I got on well with dselect from the beginning, without reading any >documentation about it, and I find it a convenient, useful tool. <grin> Am >I in a minority of one, I wonder? I'd be very interested to learn what >people's specific gripes are. > >-- Mark > Suggest deselect could benefit from a line worth of useful keystrokes on screen at all times. Pine provides an example, something like this.
I also find it annoying that each time you mark a package that requires dependency work, you wind up reading the help stuff, and have to exit the help. "Just take me to it" and show me where the help is and howto exit. >Just my 2 cents... Ciao! DaveW > -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
