In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write: | |On Sun, 16 Jun 1996, Amos Shapira wrote: | |> What are the sizes and times on your binary? | |$ ls -l /usr/sbin/sendmail |-rwsr-xr-x 1 root root 235864 May 7 14:44 /usr/sbin/sendmail | |$ file /usr/sbin/sendmail |/usr/sbin/sendmail: setuid ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1, |stripped | | |> |[EMAIL PROTECTED]| ls -l /usr/sbin/sendmail |> -rwsr-xr-x 1 root root 229376 May 22 16:14 /usr/sbin/sendmail* |> |> These times and sizes match the ones in the .deb file (do 'dpkg -c |> sendmail-8.7.5-4.deb'). | |$ cd /debian/unstable/binary-i386/mail | |$ ls -l sendmail-8.7.5-4.deb |-r--r--r-- 1 root root 563907 May 7 12:16 sendmail-8.7.5-4.deb | |$ dpkg -c sendmail-8.7.5-4.deb | grep sbin/sendmail | |-rwsr-xr-x root/root 235864 May 7 14:44 1996 usr/sbin/sendmail | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ matches what's |installed on my system | | |Weird. | |Two possibilities spring to mind: | |1. yours is dated may 22, mine is may 7. maybe a new version came out which |was accidentally compiled as a.out
Then the minor number would have been advanced (>= 5 instead of 4), wouldn't it? | |2. your may 22 is referring to 1995, not 1996 and you have an old package |which somehow got renamed to the current release filename. As for the '95 theory, I doubt that since it should have showed the year if it was that old. As for the renaming - maybe. "dpkg -I" shows: |birnam| dpkg -I sendmail-8.7.5-4.deb old debian package, version 0.939000. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ |my sendmail-8.7.5-4.deb is from my mirror, which is updated every night. |where did you get your sendmail.deb file from? >From tsx-11, as far as I remember (just grabbed things yesterday, but tsx didn't have everything so I took some things from ftp.debian.org). Will try to fetch from another archive. --Amos --Amos Shapira | "Of course Australia was marked for 133 Shlomo Ben-Yosef st. | glory, for its people had been chosen Jerusalem 93 805 | by the finest judges in England." ISRAEL [EMAIL PROTECTED] | -- Anonymous
