on Wed, 20 Nov 2002 06:25:57PM -0500, Derrick 'dman' Hudson insinuated: > On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 01:58:28PM -0500, Nori Heikkinen wrote: > > | really? i've been beating my head against this for a while now, and > | have to date only managed to get dark-blue-and-pink syntax > | highlighting on the Suns i work on ... exporting TERM=dtterm doesn't > | seem to do much, either. do i need to rewrite my syntax highlighting > | configuration files, or something? any tips on this would be greatly > | appreciated! > > If you use a dark (black) background in your terminal like I do, then > put > set bg=dark > syn on > in your .vimrc. Then vim will use lighter colors for the > highlighting. If you want gvim's gui to match, add > hi Normal guibg=black guifg=white > before the 'syn on' line. > > The problem with using TERM=xterm on Solaris is that all you get is > bold and underlines for "highlighting" because programs will think > your terminal doesn't have any color support on it.
right, that's exactly my problem. so you too are saying it should be
dtterm? or xtermc? nothing i export my TERM to seems to make any
difference at all.
</nori>
--
.~. nori @ sccs.swarthmore.edu
/V\ http://www.sccs.swarthmore.edu/~nori/jnl/
// \\ @ maenad.net
/( )\ www.maenad.net
^`~'^
msg14277/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
