Kai Grossjohann writes ("Re: dselect complaints"): > [Ian Jackson:]>>>>> On Sun, 19 May 96 14:34 BST, Ian Jackson > > I know that there are many people who don't like dselect. > > [...] > > Suggestions for improvements that don't involve a complete > > restructuring are still welcome. > > I don't have any problem at all with the interface of dselect, but I > wish it would not depend on the correctness of the Packages.gz file to > operate correctly. WIBNI there was an option where dpkg --avail -R > were run on the three directories given in ``[A]ccess'' and dselect > used that information? > > I think that could be done without too much restructuring in the > dselect code (though I know none of it).
You're right, and I've implemented this in 1.2.1. Ian.