On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 02:21:08PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote: > --- "Steve C. Lamb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > See, Thomas pointed to a web page where a WM's text file configuration > > was defended because it was too complex to represent graphically. Yet > > in the above we have 5 items.
> It's not that it's too complex -- it's just that *trying* to do so -- to be
> a comprehensive means would be a hinderance in the long-run.
Which is why I mentioned the 80% rule. Why leave this out when it is a
fairly common operation that shouldd be made as simple as possible to do as it
ties directly to the main thrust of the program; starting, managing and
closing windows which contain applications!
> > Why does it NEED to be in text?
> If you haven't dug into fvwm (as an example), I can appreciate how you might
> think this so -- but there are a lot of aspects of fvwm that you just
> couldn't represent graphically. fvwm has hundreds of style options, and
> many focus policy hints.
Pardon me if I don't believe you when you say that the miriad of
*graphical style options* can't be represented *graphically*. If they
couldn't then they wouldn't exist, would they?
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
-------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
