On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 04:54:57AM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote: > Erik Steffl wrote: > > are you talking about pre-2k times only? I mean during last four years > > imap support seems to be pretty good (and improving). Thunderbird > > definitely isn't the first usable MUA, as far as imap support goes. > > Nope. In the past few years I've tried Netscape, TheBat!, Sylpheed-Claws, > Eudora, KMail, mutt, Thunderbird and a slew of others I can no longer > remember. I don't recall any of them outside of Thunderbird being able to use
If you are going to use non-free stuff like The Bat!, try Mulbelry. It is a *proper* IMAP client, and if it is used with a proper IMAP server, it is quite nice. Oh, and it has Windows, Linux and Mac versions. > vounch for 3 clients which come up to snuff on that regards. Thunderbird, > Evolution (which at least has reply-to-list!) and, get this, Outlook. The Outlook is the *BANE* of all IMAP server support staff and programmers. I have never heard of such a misbehaving client in my life as Outlook and Outlook Express (different programs, different bugs, same must-be-on-purpose level of incompetence in the IMAP layer) :( -- Henrique M. Holschuh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
