On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 03:34:02AM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote: > With that said let's apply it to the conversation at hand. Are you > implying that for the sake of sanity the individual they should place > limitations on the email they manage on their own system. While my 100k > example was an extreme case (but a *real* case) even the cases where it was a > mere 15-20k messages (several a month) took a while to work through. That's > not that much when you get down to it. I've got one folder here that is > sitting at 3k and growing, another at 5k but fairly static though the contents > shift. I'm also not into archiving tons of mail so I'd classify my usage as > moderate, not heavy. >
Wow. I have ~75 messages across all my mailboxes and i consider that too much. So much for my 133t 5ki1z :-) -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://familiasanchez.net/~sanchezr
pgpxUc39NJ2rW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
