-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > I'll have to disagree on this. I think it is always better to > specifically name the ditribution you want to track in sources.list. > For example, woody, sarge, sid, etc. > > It is much more apparent, that way, what the intent is. > > -Roberto >
For me, also being rather new to Debian, this raises another question. Currently, I am running an "unstable" machine (I have unstable in sources.list). I will probably keep that. I'm just curious: If someone has "sid" in sources.list, does sid become the new testing? If so, what will be the distro name of unstable? I hope that's clear. :) Rick - -- "If life was fair, Elvis would be alive and all the impersonators would be dead." - Johnny Carson -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCo3stOlHq0MpoXLoRAg/aAJ9AANQ+OeMSy6Oe9hbKrTGAIQgkfgCdEW29 AgZxNU7pRMh8MnevMbG37pc= =PVNs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
