On Tuesday 03 May 2005 09:50, michael wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-05-02 at 16:08 +0100, Alan Chandler wrote:
...
> > 'This is a bad bad thing, but not as bad as it would be if \"x=5\", so
> > thats it'

> Would be yet harder still if you correct your grammar and put the
> missing apostrophe in penultimate word, viz "that's"

Oops - but in that case the string will be

that\'s   because it has already had the addslashes function applied to it.
-- 
Alan Chandler
http://www.chandlerfamily.org.uk


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to