Andrey Andreev wrote: >Radu Brumariu wrote: > > >>Andrey Andreev wrote: >> >> >>>Radu Brumariu wrote: >>> >>> >>>>Andrey Andreev wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>>------------------ >>>>>>Configuration file `/etc/qmail/tcp.smtp' >>>>>>==> Modified (by you or by a script) since installation. >>>>>>==> Package distributor has shipped an updated version. >>>>>> What would you like to do about it ? Your options are: >>>>>> Y or I : install the package maintainer's version >>>>>> N or O : keep your currently-installed version >>>>>> D : show the differences between the versions >>>>>> Z : background this process to examine the situation >>>>>>The default action is to keep your current version. >>>>>>*** tcp.smtp (Y/I/N/O/D/Z) [default=N] ? n >>>>>>------------------ >>>>>> >>>>>>How can I get rid of this warning ? - I want apt-get to be completely >>>>>>silent. I know that this could be dangerous - but in my case it is ok >>>>>>given that it is me that control the repository and that I have tested >>>>>>all the packages before putting them there. >>>>>> >>>>>>So to put it short how do I silence apt-get completely ?. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>Check the yes command. >>>>> >>>>>You probably want something like >>>>> >>>>>yes | apt-get upgrade -youroptionshere >>>>> >>>>>or >>>>> >>>>>yes N | apt-get upgrade -youroptionshere >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>apt-get has alread a switch just for that : apt-get -y upgrade . RTFM. >>>> >>>> >>>And -y does not cover all warnings, as you would see if you RTFM >>>yourself. Next time try to answer the question. >>> >>> >>> >>>From TFM : >> >> -y, --yes, --assume-yes, >> Automatic yes to prompts; assume "yes" as answer to all >>prompts >> and run non-interactively >> >>all prompts, except held packages or removing essential packages , in >>which case --force-yes should help. >>The question was on how to get rid of the messages that ask about the >>configuration file changes. -y does help in that direction. >> >> >> > >Once again - read the original question. The OP _knows_ about -y and >--force-yes. He uses them. See? They *did not* rid him of questions >about config files. The OP states that very clearly. That is the point >of the question. Geddit? Now that we both understand the problem, you >should be able to see why using yes was needed. > >Furthermore, please refrain from showing off whatever knowledge you have >about apt-get, and sending people to RTFM, without trying to help or >ever understanding the problem. > >Andro > > > Yes, you're right, he was using those switches . It was my mistake and I apologize . Perhaps I'm the one who should RTFM.
-- "Stat rosa pristina nomine, nomina nuda tenemus" -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
