On Tuesday 04 January 2005 10:08, Dave Ewart wrote: > On Tuesday, 04.01.2005 at 09:22 -0500, Brendan wrote: > > On Tuesday 04 January 2005 04:26, Dave Ewart wrote: > > > > In a country of 300M people, [...] > > > > > > Sounds like you're referring to the US. Why restrict your comment > > > to the US? Your remark would have more credibility if you weren't > > > so US-centric. > > > > I don't want to disrupt your obvious ploy for anti-US sentiment, but > > maybe he doesn't speak for other countries for a reason? Maybe he > > lives in the US? Just a guess. > > My comment wasn't anti-US. My comment was certainly anti-UScentricism, > though. > > I was pointing out that that the original poster appeared to be speaking > for the US, where the issue is larger than that.
So? He was speaking for what he knows. We should all be so smart. I find many who are very eager to bull about things they have no personal experience about, depleted uranium notwithstanding. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
