Brian Nelson wrote: > Not to promote the spread of FUD, but interestingly it has come up > recently on debian-legal that the MIT/X11 license could possibly be > interpreted as non-free: > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2002/debian-legal-200211/msg00164.html
No, the referenced thread merely asks the question of what exactly it means to "deal in" a piece of software (as the phrase is used in the X11 license). That license clearly states that "deal in" includes, but is not limited to, distributing (including selling) and modifying. Craig -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
