Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote: > On Sat, 11 Dec 2004, Ron Johnson wrote: > > >>2005, or 2006, when Sarge ships? :/ >> > > > Depends on how much longer the hot babe/LCC/blob threads are going to > last. :) > 'last'? That implies that there will be an end. Hot-babe and LCC may have relatively simple solutions, but as long as there are corporations that want more money and free software isn't as profitable as proprietary software, the blob issue probably won't stop.
Also, blob and hot-babe wouldn't hold up sarge, blob is not directly related to Debian and if hot-babe is delayed it will just be put into etch instead of being rushed into sarge. Please correct me if I'm wrong, I haven't been following the threads that closely. -- -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.1 GAT/CM$/CS>$/CC/IT$/M/S/O/U dpu s+:++ !a C++$>C+++$ UB+++>++++$L++++$*-- P+>++$ L+++(++++)$ E-(---) W+++>$ N(+) o? K- w--(---) O? M V? PS++@ PE-@ Y+@ PGP++(+++)>$ t? 5? X? R tv--(-) b++(+++)@ DI? D? G e->++++ h* r? z* ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ David Mandelberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
