Hi and thanks for answering. I know that the main problem of testing is the bugs :-) What I would like to know is how many bugs does testing have? I mean, are the bugs so many that you cannot work at all with debian testing? I do not need any special applications: Just C/C++ development tools, KDE3 and its apps, kdeveloper, anjuta, perl, XFree, etc. What kind of applications have most of the stability problems?
As I previously said, the reason that I need KDE3 is the Greek support that is has which, I think, is better than the other XWindows managers. TIA, Mihalis. On 12 Nov 2002, Shyamal Prasad wrote: > Date: 12 Nov 2002 18:42:35 -0600 > From: Shyamal Prasad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: woody to testing > Resent-Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 18:42:57 -0600 (CST) > Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > "mtsouk" == mtsouk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > mtsouk> I am considering of moving to testing as well. I want to > mtsouk> ask a few questions before doing this: > > mtsouk> 1. What are the major benefits of testing? > > You get newer software. > > mtsouk> 2. What are the major problems of testing? > > You get newer bugs. > > mtsouk> 3. Can I go back to woody after moving to testing? > > Not easily. > > mtsouk> 4. Which version of KDE does testing have? > > 2.2.2 I believe (I don't run testing, and I don't use no skeenking KDE > or GNOME so you don't have to trust me on that, but that is also the > real reason I'm happy with Woody ;-) > > Good luck! > Cheers! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
