Sam Watkins wrote: > On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 12:10:43AM -0500, Adam Aube wrote: >> Here's the problem - eth0 and eth0:0 are identical, so you have defined >> the interface twice. > > really? I can bind eth0 and eth0:0 to different IPs on my 2.4 box no > problem.
I just tested this on my system (2.6) and it is the same here. > this website: > > http://pachome1.pacific.net.sg/~harish/linuxipalias.html > > says that eth0:0 and eth0:1 are different from eth0: It was my understanding that eth0 and eth0:0 were equivalent. It appears I was mistaken. Thank you for pointing this out. Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
