On Thursday 25 November 2004 02:08, Micha Feigin wrote: > At Wed, 24 Nov 2004 16:08:00 +0100,
> Both cvs and subversion can handle binary files, although not very > efficiently (although subversion claims so, I don't completely believe it). > > Its a problem to coherently store differences between such files where you > don't understand the contents and thus can't make smart diffs, or where > large parts of the file change to handle small changes. > > If the files don't change too much its still ok to use cvs or subversion > (its mainly useful for handling bitmaps as part of program code). I am running a subversion svnserve process on my work laptop, a win2000 machine. As a client I have tortoise svn. I then use subversion to manage version control on my m$ word documents. It was the binary diff ability that made me decide to do it that way rather than just keep lots of versions of the document file around. -- Alan Chandler [EMAIL PROTECTED] First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. --Gandhi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]