On Thursday 18 November 2004 12:02, Maurits van Rees wrote: > On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 10:34:41AM +0000, Richard Lyons wrote: > > Do mutts and squirrels play together? > > > > Imap access has become sooo sloooow using kmail (seems even slower since > > my most recent upgrade on my desktop box - sid, BTW) and it is > > sometimes as bad using squirrelmail. So I ssh-d to the server and > > tried mutt. As far as I can tell, mutt cannot see subfolders that > > squirrelmail and kmail can. > > I use both (almost exclusively mutt though) and don't seem to have > those problems, but I haven't really checked. But your problem may be > solved with the following snippet from the mutt doc: > > 6.3.85. imap_list_subscribed > > Type: boolean > Default: no > > This variable configures whether IMAP folder browsing will look for > only subscribed folders or all folders. This can be toggled in the > IMAP browser with the toggle-subscribed function.
Aah! That looks likely. I'll check when I get back later. THanks. -- richard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
