-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Debian isn't a true democracy. We elect our leader, and thereafter > the leader acts under his own accord. It's a representative democracy, much like the US government. Except Debian actually works. > The recent leaders have generally taken a hands-off approach so you > probably don't really notice they're even there. However, I believe > some leaders before my time (Bruce Perens, for example), were much more > active and took more advantage of their power. Do you see this for the better or worse, and if worse, how would you change it? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBlmxyUzgNqloQMwcRAshOAJwI29TAIFV0dUTAAZQL4IDvyEx62gCeNbNs 5Xt5HkHV1OBLLoi4Jf5ATc8= =h6Sx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
