On Sun, 03 Oct 2004 19:30:38 -0700, Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > <#secure method=pgp mode=sign> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Alex Nordstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Please don't modify your reply-to header to exclude the list. I'm > > interpreting the header as a wish to be CCed, which I respect; I expect > > my signature to be treated with the same courtesy. > > Use reply-to-list instead of reply and it'll do what you want it to > (in gnus at least). > > > Now, I'm not sure how well Matrox meets the requirements of the OP in > > terms of price and 3D game performance. They seem, however, not to be > > quite as intent on being altogether evil as ATI and Nvidia, and they > > should be great fun if you like triple-head setups, but I do believe > > you pay for it as well. This is not based on first-hand experience, but > > I am seriously considering them for whenever I decide to put together > > some new hardware. (Not much of a gamer here, though.) > > So can we hear from Matrox users about their experiences? > Particularly, from Linux gamers?
Well, I'm using a very old Matrox Millenium II PCI card, and as far as 3D is concerned - it's a no go. Not so sure with the newer ones although I haven't seen Matrox cards claiming that they have OpenGL support on their cards' boxes. Price-wise - expensive, but the cards output good quality video for multiple screens. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
