<#secure method=pgp mode=sign> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Wim De Smet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > You're looking at it wrong. Nobody really wants them to open source > their driver. Okay maybe because it's easier. But people really want > to be able to write their own driver. And they can still do that, nobody's stopping them. All we (at least RMS and Iare in the same boat, and likely thousands of others) ask is that we get those drivers under a license that meets the DFSG and doesn't make us run through tons of extra hoops and user-hostile licensing. > But they won't or can't release the necessary info because the > software has to tie so thigtly in with the hardware. And to be > honest, even if they would be able to open source their own drivers, > I doubt they would. Actually, it sounds like they could open source most of the drivers and disclose who the third parties who are preventing them from going totally open so the community can put pressure on the wound proper. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBYLZFUzgNqloQMwcRAp9TAJ9VEB5MwF9gQ8EjZaaeX2xdooN45gCgztRy tt5EDVwIH2Os2ZcBva+PgEk= =P9GF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
