On Fri, Oct 15, 2004 at 11:00:18AM +0100, Alan Chandler wrote: > Both you guys have missed my main message - the speed I was talking about > was using SCP - so perhaps its also processors trying to do encrypt the > message.
No, that is neglegible, unless this is a 386 or something. > The throughput with nfs was more like 2MB every 3 or 4 minutes - something > somewhere in that setup is causing me extreme grief and I don't know what. > I could really do with some pointers as to why that is not working. As far > as I am concerned 05.Mbytes (thats what it was) is plenty fast enough (and > its a 100mbit ethernet anyway). Have you tried what I suggested? I have seen this before. -- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ ( t | i | m | @ | i | t | . | k | p | t | . | c | c ) \_/ \_/ \_/ \_/ \_/ \_/ \_/ \_/ \_/ \_/ \_/ \_/ \_/ GPG key fingerprint = 1DEE CD9B 4808 F608 FBBF DC21 2807 D7D3 09CA 85BF -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
