On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 02:00:17PM +0200, Anonymous said > I'm running an "unstable" system and I need remote access by > ssh. "Stable" is considered better for servers (but I need > unstable for newer versions of a lot of packages on my > workstation), "testing" gets security updates last, but > "unstable" has a higher version number of ssh. it safer to > run the stable ssh (1:3.4p1-1.woody.3) or the unstable one > (1:3.8.1p1-8)?
Neither have any known vulnerabilities at the moment. -rob -- Words of the day: eternity server AGT. AMME Syria Semtex FIPS140 kilo class -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
