On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 08:19:27AM -0400, S.D.A. wrote: > On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 07:54:13PM -0400 or thereabouts, Michael Marsh wrote: > > On Sun, 19 Sep 2004 18:43:07 -0400, Carl Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Well, the most obvious is flashblock. > > > > I don't think that's what Pigeon had in mind, useful though it is. > > I think what he(?) meant was something that extracts the navigation > > URLs within a flash animation so that the site is navigable. For > > example, many sites have a flash-based homepage with no > > non-flash links presented, so if you're not running flash, the site > > is useless. > > Actually NOT so -- I would think these kind of Flash sites are in the minority, > at least in 2004.
They are, at least among the kind of sites I tend to visit (mainly technical ones). But they do exist, and they are a nuisance, and a plugin as described above would be very useful. -- Pigeon Be kind to pigeons Get my GPG key here: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x21C61F7F
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
