ok, #route del -net 87.7.167.224 netmask 255.255.255.240 eth0
#route del -net 87.7.167.224 netmask 255.255.255.240 eth1 then run #route -n and the output should not have the eth's entries. #ip neigh show and send the output On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 14:19:03 -0700 (PDT), "Sergio Basurto" wrote: > > move from your routing table, the entries for your > eth's cards. > > route del ... > On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 23:15:45 +0200, Jacob Larsen wrote: > > > > > Sergio Basurto wrote: > > > Ok, send the > > > shell~#route -n > > > output... > > > > # route -n > > Kernel IP routing table > > Destination Gateway Genmask Flags > > Metric Ref Use > > Iface > > 81.7.167.224 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.240 U > > > 0 0 eth0 > > 81.7.167.224 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.240 U > > > 0 0 eth1 > > 81.7.167.224 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.240 U > > > 0 0 > > bond0 > > 0.0.0.0 81.7.167.225 0.0.0.0 UG > > > 0 0 > > bond0 > > > > > On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 22:21:58 +0200, Jacob Larsen > > wrote: > > >>>>So the solution is to not set a gateway for eth0 > and > > >>>>eth1, but only set > > >>>>it for bond0? > > >>> > > >>>Yes, > > >>> > > >>>But you also could have gw for your eth's cards, > but > > >>>you must assure that those routes do not supercede > > > > > > the > > > > > >>>bond0. > > >> > > >>I am not sure that I understand what you mean by > > >>supersede. > > >>The only gateway I have is 81.7.167.225. > > >>Do you mean that I can have a gateway for eth0 and > > > > > > eth1 > > > > > >>if it is > > >>different than that of bond0? > > >> > > >>By not setting a gateway for eth0 and eth1 in > > >>/etc/network/interfaces it > > >>still doesn't work. > > >> > > >>What should I do? > > >> > > >>Thanks, > > >>Jacob > > > > > > -- > > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Ing. Sergio Basurto Juárez > Tel: 04455-85322945 > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ing. Sergio Basurto Juárez Tel: 04455-85322945