John Summerfield wrote: > ... >> - procmail's configuration is almost as hideous as sendmail's, and i'd >> rather not use it if i don't have to. The only local delivery feature i >> really need is server-side filters, and i'd like them to be maintainable >> from a web page or mail client if possible, but this isn't essential. > > Take it slowly, bit by bit. You can do lots with simple regular > expressions.
I don't want to do lots with simple regular expressions, i want to do a little, without procmail if possible. > ... >> - I've also heard good things about MailScanner as a virus/spam filter >> (certainly it seems to be more polished than amavisd). However, >> MailScanner in woody doesn't seem to support postfix or ClamAV, and >> requires exim. This doesn't seem to be a general limitation with the >> products, but simply with the woody versions of them. With sarge, the >> situation seems better, and both postfix and ClamAV are supported by >> MailScanner. >> >> >> > At this time I'd be installing Sarge. I would not be seeking to do an > upgrade any time soon. Except that until sarge is released, it doesn't get priority security updates. -- Paul <http://paulgear.webhop.net> -- Did you know? Email addresses can be forged easily. This message is signed with GNU Privacy Guard <http://www.gnupg.org> and Enigmail <http://enigmail.mozdev.org> so you can be sure it comes from me.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
