Stephen,
you give me an example concerning how to filter the debian mailing-
lists, based on "X-Mailing-List:" header that the mail server add to
messages.
...But some mailing-lists like "snort-sign", "snort-users",
"gnupg-devel", do not add the X-headers....
Do you have some advices to made a "magic" configuration like for
debian? I suppose you need to analyze an e-mail header as example....
But if you remember some analogous situations you already examined...
Il ven, 2004-08-27 alle 00:06, s. keeling ha scritto:
> Incoming from Lorenzo Rossi:
> >
> > Il gio, 2004-08-26 alle 21:47, s. keeling ha scritto:
> >
> > > Solution to this is scoring:
> > >
> > > :0:
> > > * 1^0 ^To:.*debian-user
> > > * 1^0 ^Cc:.*debian-user
> > > ${HOME}/Mail/debian-user
> > >
> >
> > What does it meen * 1^0 ^To:.*debian-user ??
> > ^^^
> > I'm a newb...
>
> You say that like it's a bad thing. :-)
>
Also my mother is worried about my healt.... :)
> Recipes start out with a negative score. Generic patterns that match
> add "1" to that score. Once the score goes positive, the action
> clause is executed. So, for the above, a match on either triggers the
> action (a non-match has no effect). "man procmailsc" explains this.
> If you want the action to trigger when both match, you can "seed" the
> score:
>
> :0:
> * -2^0
> * 1^0 ^To:.*debian-user
> * 1^0 ^Cc:.*debian-user
> debian-user
>
> That "-2^0" will set the beginning score to -2.
>
Thk for the teaching...you explain me clear the concept but looking at
the output in procmail log file I can see the following lines, and a
dubt arise in my mind... :)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
procmail: [2147] Fri Aug 27 23:00:34 2004
procmail: Assigning "LOGABSTRACT=all"
procmail: No match on
"(^((Original-)?(Resent-)?(To|Cc|Bcc)|(X-Envelope|Apparently(-Resent)?)-To):(.*[^-a-zA-Z0-9_.])?)[EMAIL
PROTECTED]"
procmail: No match on "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
procmail: No match on "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
procmail: No match on "[EMAIL PROTECTED] # Anything from
namp-hacker"
procmail: Score: 0 0 "^To:.*rsbac # Anything from
rsbac"
procmail: Score: 0 0 "^Cc:.*rsbac # will go to
$MAILDIR/rsbac"
procmail: No match on "^X\-Mailing\-List:.*debian-\/[a-z-]*"
procmail: Score: 0 0 "^To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
procmail: Score: 0 0 "^Cc:[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
procmail: Score: 1 1 "^To:.*snort-sigs"
procmail: Score: 0 1 "^Cc:.*snort-sigs"
procmail: Locking "/home/milos94/Mail/IN.snort-sigs.lock"
procmail: Assigning "LASTFOLDER=/home/milos94/Mail/IN.snort-sigs"
procmail: Opening "/home/milos94/Mail/IN.snort-sigs"
procmail: Acquiring kernel-lock
procmail: Unlocking "/home/milos94/Mail/IN.snort-sigs.lock"
procmail: Notified comsat:
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/milos94/Mail/IN.snort-sigs"
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 27 23:00:34 2004
Subject: [Snort-sigs] snort-rules update @ Fri Aug 27 15:15:43 2004
Folder: /home/milos94/Mail/IN.snort-sigs
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Focusing on:
-------------------------------------------------------------
[....]
procmail: Score: 1 1 "^To:.*snort-sigs"
procmail: Score: 0 1 "^Cc:.*snort-sigs"
[....]
-------------------------------------------------------------
It seems to me that procmail set the initial value score to 0
What I'm missing?
Probably I should read again the procmail docs...
> > > I'm susbscribed to multiple debian-* lists. This separates them all
> > > out into separate folders:
> > >
> > > # ------------------------------------
> > > # debian-${MATCH}
> >
> > Wow very powerfull! I like it...:)
> >
> > You give me a lots of suggestions...
> > Do you think my problems are mainly related to the configurations of
> > rules?
>
> I ran into a lot of problems when I began. Multiple readings of "man
> procmail*" helped a lot. There's also the procmail-users mailing
> list.
I just subscribed to the mailing-list, and now I'm browsing the archive.
> Go read through their archives if you can't afford to
> subscribe. There's many _very_ good websites out there to help you
> with lots of examples. Timo Salmi's is pretty helpful when you're new
> to this.
Yes, I'm studing his material...
> So is Nancy McGough's (sp?).
I have not read jet....
> If you read Usenet newsgroups,
> comp.mail.misc is the place to go.
>
> One suggestion you should take as gospel: make a copy, THEN change
> your recipe. It can be fairly difficult to figure out what's going on
> when a recipe fails spectacularly. If you've a backup, you can avoid
> that problem.
:) Yoy have said one of the most important rule...infact I'm doing the
tests on a copy of my e-mail files. I have already experienced some
problems...
>
> --
> Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
> (*) http://www.spots.ab.ca/~keeling
> - -
>
Thanks again
Lorenzo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
