On Fri, 27 Aug 2004, Brendon Higgins wrote: > I'd remember, but I don't remember doing anything regarding that particular > acronym. At least, not manually.
A new kernel could have it enabled by default, or something... > Well, my computer can talk to any other, to a degree. For some reason larger I mean through a router. It certainly is having trouble. > data just fine, but seems to have trouble sending it. Mind you, this only > happens to individual streams, and it does not happen in Win98, which is why > I suspect something in my Debian install is broken. Does the Linux TCP/IP > implementation really differ that much from Windows that a problem like this > is possible to exist in one but not the other? Yes. Linux TCP/IP is to Win98 TCP/IP what a P4 is to an original 80386SX. And there are a huge lot of completely buggy TCP/IP routers and firewalls out there, that fail to work right as soon as something that was not being done before is used. Never mind TCP/IP is forward-compatible, when implemented correctly. Usually, it is Linux and the BSDs that hit those buggy routers first, since the Windows TCP/IP stack is something of the stone age that can barely talk to others. When you only use the 5 most common words in a language, it gets difficult to find others that won't understand you... But don't ask it to do anything too dificult. -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
