On Friday 27 August 2004 09:59, Erik Steffl wrote: > I just noticed that famd is eating (almost) 100% CPU, before that I > didn't even know such a thing existed. Anybody has any ideas why would > it go crazy? > > top says: > > PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND > > 19629 erik 25 0 3616 1364 2572 R 87.4 0.2 510:36.14 famd > > 2653 root 6 -10 97.7m 52m 20m S 5.6 6.0 660:17.24 XFree86 > > ... > > strace says (this is repeated over and over...): > > --- SIGIO (I/O possible) @ 0 (0) --- > write(2, "*************** overflow sigqueu"..., 58) = 58 > rt_sigreturn(0x2) = 51 > > TIA > > erik
Hi Erik, Is it related to this? http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=252896. If so, it doesn't look like anyone knows why just yet. I've had this happen to me once, and I think it was related to an SMB share I had mounted. I don't know how to duplicate the problem yet, though. Justin Guerin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
